How much do we really know about the science of emotion and happiness? (Pre-publication manuscript)

Please note this is the pre-publication manuscript to the article that has been published in the BPS Psych-Talk magazine (also the formatting is not quite right but I’m not sure how to format it properly on here):

Evangelou, G. (2019). How much do we really know about the science of emotion and happiness?. BPS Psych-Talk, 93, 3-4.

Link: https://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/publication-by-series/psych-talk/psychtalk-issue-93-may-2019.html

How much do we really know about the science of emotion and happiness?

Emotion

In terms of what an emotion is and the reasons/functions of it is largely debated, from the Darwinian perspective right across to the social constructivist. This debate may even remain so until the end of time and can be left to philosophers. Science is there to identify the properties and effects of phenomena, and under what conditions they are caused by (Edelman & Tononi, 2013). There are discrepancies about the universality of Ekman’s basic emotional expressions, and emotional language (i.e. fear, anger) due to untranslatable words which leaves this also still up for debate. What science has managed to do is reduce emotion to its raw state via natural semantic metalanguage (Wierzbicka, 2009), attempting to define cognitive scenarios through universal human concepts. Additionally, what can be objectively identified as emotion is an affective system (Blanchette & Richards, 2010) in which we subjectively experience positive and negative states. These states interact with and influence cognition, including higher level cognitive processes such as reasoning, judgement and decision making.

Continue reading “How much do we really know about the science of emotion and happiness? (Pre-publication manuscript)”

The neuropsychology of free will: An expensive mechanism (pre-publication manuscript)

Please note this is the pre-publication manuscript to the article that has been published in the BPS Psych-Talk magazine (also the formatting is not quite right but I’m not sure how to format it properly on here):

Evangelou, G. (2019). The neuropsychology of free will: An expensive                mechanism. BPS Psych-Talk, 92, 6-8.

Link: https://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/publication-by-series/psych-talk/psychtalk-issue-92-january-2019.html

The neuropsychology of free will: An expensive mechanism

George Evangelou

Concerns of investigating free will

What is free will? Let’s save for the infinite philosophical rabbit hole for now… Please raise your hand. Congratulations, whether you raised it or not, you exercised your free will to do so (I hope). That will suffice as a basic example and allow us to move forward. Conflict with free will and its subject to question has been around long before neuroscience, whether it be: theology (the paradox between an omniscient being and our free will), physics (subject to physical laws of the universe), biology and evolution (subject to our genetic make-up and survival of the fittest) or of course, philosophy (“Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains”; Rousseau, 1762). Continue reading “The neuropsychology of free will: An expensive mechanism (pre-publication manuscript)”

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑